Thought-of-Concept: Yisrael Juris

Notary Public: This Pending PhD-in-Law Impacts Juris tools of close loop feedback control system of illusive-errors that never criticize anti-Semite self-destructed GB Crown

Darling Buds-of-Exodus: Welcome Hebrew auto-affiliation; Quote Ref: https://site.eu/?aff=fU9pcd; &; https://site.eu/?aff=juTNcC; @ Mt.Temple

The Global Pedagogy Journal Exodus 2021-26, 3rd-ed issn: 1740-9527 & issn: 1742-819x

Concept, Thought of

Jurisprudence is an abstract idea, or invention, of a Greek reference to (Law of Knowledge, or Rule of law), as in:

Jurisprudence ≡► Juris prudential

If (Jus, Jur ≡► Law), then (Prudentia ≡► Knowledge)

Law of Knowledge ≈► Rule of law

Some observers may also think of three inter-related key words, such as: 1-Juris, 2-Pedagogy, and 3-Knowledge as a physical matter. In the absence of Newton Eternal Time, Hebrew civilization of 1750 BC implemented facts of the conditional order. Thus, If (Knowledge is subjective under Monarch of no written constitution), then (Juris is undesirable or impossible to achieve). This is observed to be proven by the evidence of witnessing the behavior of some Monarchs of anti-Semite resources. Otherwise, If (knowledge is a physical matter), then (it is a fact of most precious key of Rule-of-Law & Juris-justice). The English law seems to be the common law of the legal system of England and Wales, comprising mainly criminal law and civil law, each branch having its own courts and procedures under the one crown. It may also term the law of England and Wales and is applied in agreements that parties may adopt the jurisdiction of England and Wales as well as matters within the physical jurisdiction. In England and Wales, the most authoritative law is statutory legislation, which comprises Acts of Parliament, regulations and by-laws. In the absence of any statutory law, the common law with its principle of stare decisis forms residual source of law, based on judicial decisions and custom. Then, England as an ex-Roman colony inherited the Roman law which was based on Greek law as well as Mesopotamian jurisprudence of logic. For example, the citizen law was the body of common laws that applied to Roman citizens and the individuals who had jurisdiction. England shall never apply the so-called Islamic Sharia as an English jurisprudence, because Sharia, if it is accurate, is not jurisprudence of the English dream of accomplishment. England and its Englishness are not the push over, they had suffered additional humiliation by foreign scholars of the following claims, against Church-of-England and its crown at its lowest point, wrongly encouraged by the English Crown Prince 2020 via false economic incentives. Thus, universities that allow the following false claims are considered to be liable, unless they withdrew their recognition. For example, if (keys of illusion), then (why most Muslims were born, or shall die @ Loo); see impact.

Continue cursor/ next columns

The logic indicators referred the following suggestions to the GB crown manipulations, since the 17th century and up-to-date. This indicated that USSR-Stalin (1879-1953) was GB crown agent of Ukraine, and that the recipe of all religions were invented in England as the base of illusive colonialism, as in:

Mukul (2008) falsely claimed that English common law was influenced by medieval Islamic law. ussain (2001) falsely claimed that Islamic juris was transmitted to England by the Normans, through the close connection between the Norman kingdoms of Roger II in Sicily ruling over a conquered Islamic admin, and Henry II in England. If (Sharia is accurate), then (it shall never be jurisprudence). Makdisi (1999) drew comparisons between Royal English contract protected by action of debt and the Islamic Aqd. The English assize of novel disseisin (a petty assize adopted in 1166 AD at Assizes of Clarendon); Istihqaq; English jury; and Lafif in classical Maliki school of juris were copied to England. Makdisi (1999) falsely argued that the law schools known as “Inns of Court in England” which may have originated from Islamic law, and states that the methodology of legal precedent and reasoning by analogy (Qiyas) are similar in both Islamic and common law systems (El-Gamal, 2006). Gaudiosi, (1988) falsely argued that the English trust and agency institutions, which were introduced by Crusaders, may have been adapted from the Islamic Waqf and Hawala institutions they came across in the Middle East. If (legal procedural similarities), then (they were originated in Greece); and Badr (1978) falsely argued that parallels existed between the Waqf and the trusts used to establish Merton College by Walter de Merton, who had connections with the Knights Templar. Herein, the Islamic assertions are of Hebrew Mesopotamian origin, 1750 BC, as reference to editors and place of editorial and press in Babylon. In defense of the HM Englishness, Jurisprudence never existed in England, and that Britain never had written constitution. This enabled the crown to have the upper hand and feedback control of civil servants. No Islamic jurisprudence exists, and Sharia is claimed as Islamic-Jurisprudence. However, If (English Crown has no written constitution), then (Islamic Sharia is a Chinese-Whisper and not a jurisprudence); and similarities indicate Greek origin of Gods of Erebus of Chaos. The Islamic Sharia might be claimed as a law, based on Chinese-Whisper of so-called Hadeath-Nabawi (ex-speeches of prophet Mohammed [puh]), and communicated by Muslims as Chinese-Whisper.

Continue cursor/ next columns

Then, what type of civilization the GB crown is intended to establish, if politicians are the crown select who act to terrorize public in an anti-Semite fashion by using spectra of the Semite. The GB crown is ultimately sick, and its public PR is based on self-public fear. For the successive generations of more than thousand years, such learning was memorized-practiced and passed orally to successive generations, because of the limited written text, that was presented on museum plates of clay. The documented output and input are observed to be different, as approved by experimental evidence of enviro-functions. Thus, it was written, and being claimed that the Torah was edited by scholar Tora, and the Quran of Islam was edited by the successive generation of editor called Koran, and so it shall be done. This claim is supported by the evidence of absence of any Islamic-Jurisprudence, and that Sharia is based on Chinese-Whisper; if (Chinese Whisper), then (no Juris); and if GB Crown is 8-years old, then Islam is 14 years old. Adding that, Muslims were left without seating loo, thus some were born and died at loo (poor-do: GB red desk of music room). Some observers may see the judiciary system developed as a cohesive system from the mid to late 1860s, serving the Victorian upper middle class. They played a major role in the symbiosis of aristocracy and bourgeoisie of late 19th century. The overriding conspiracy may indicate that there was no library reference for Islam, but early Victorian era characterized preparations for massive editorial library in Arabic, and in preparation for colonial era, long before the fall of the Turkish Empire, and before WWI. This may also indicate that foreign philosophers were sent to the so-called Islamic cultural centers to collect or edit articles and books, with the aim to establish fake Islamic identity by disinformation. It was also used to describe obligatory legal regulations applied in modern international law to indicate peremptory norms that cannot be derogated from. These are regulations that cannot be changed or excluded by party agreement. Those regulations that can be changed are not used when party shares something and are in contrary. Herein, England and Wales's most authoritative law is statutory legislation, which comprises Acts of Parliament, regulations and by-laws. In the absence of any statutory law, the common law with its principle of stare-decisis forms the residual source of law, based on judicial decisions, custom, and usage. The GB crown prince must give a humble homage to the crown of Englishness. Herein, the Common law is made by liable sitting judges who apply both statutory law and established principles which are derived from the reasoning from earlier decisions. Equity is the other historic source of judge-made law. Common law can be amended or repealed by Parliament. Thus, if (English crown has no written constitution), then (up-skirting law (i4i.eisrael.co.uk) can be placed on Kyrgyzstan Statuary books, of Erbil Citadel-IQ). Thus, England may trigger a universal jurisprudence. Not being a civil law system, it has no comprehensive codification.

Continue cursor/ next columns

However, most of its criminal law has been codified from its common law origins, in the interests of both certainty and ease of prosecution, the murder remains under a common law of crime. Although Scotland and Northern Ireland form part of the UK and share Westminster as a primary legislature, they have separate legal systems outside the English Law. However, the International treaties such as the European Union's Treaty of Rome or the Hague-Visby Rules have effect in English law only when adopted and ratified by Act of Parliament. Adopted treaties may also be denounced by executive action, unless denouncement, or withdraw, would affect the rights enacted by Parliament. In this case, executive action can not be used owing to the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. This principle was established in the case of R (Miller) vs Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union in 2017 AD. Moreover, in England, there is a hierarchy of sources of law (Slapper 2016):

1. Legislation (primary and secondary);

2. Law rules of common law; and

equity is derived from precedent decisions;

3. Parliamentary conventions;

4. General customs; and

5. Sir William Blackstone in 1774 AD, after his appointment as a Justice of

the Court of King's Bench;

6a. Statutory instruments and ministerial orders; and

6b. By-laws of metropolitan boroughs, county and town councils.

6. Parliamentary conventions cannot be confused with international

conventions of treaties adopted by Parliament;

7. Coke and Blackstone.

A primary legislation, or Statute law, in England may take:

1. Acts of Parliament;

2. Acts of the Scottish Parliament;

3. Acts and measures of the National Assembly for Wales;

4. Statutory rules of the Northern Ireland Assembly;

5. Orders in Council are a sui generis category of legislation;

6. Secondary (or "delegated") legislation in England inc (5a, 5b).

Yet, even if we think of the Parthenon pillars of: 1-Politics, 2-Police, 3-Property, 4-Currency, 5-Measures, and 6-Justice, which embedded 7-the theology factor, then we may notice that these factors are malfunction due to the rigid model of applications, in which the landlord is the ruler and occupiers are slaves, and justice is the close circuit of the crown, of feedback control. Thus, Torah of the Babylonian Hebrews (1750) BC copied the order of concept of Rule-of-Law in 5-books and distributed worldwide as Hebrew applications of the Parthenon pillars. This evolved to be the protestant theology of church of England in which the landlord ruled and implemented the crown wish versus slaves. Thus, Jurisprudence and its Pedagogy, as concept(s), is thought of as undesirable or impossible to achieve in England as long as it remains under GB crown.

Continue cursor/ next columns

The broader approach has necessitated the reformulating and reinterpreting many of the issues canvassed in its vast literature (Cotterrell, 1984). Furthermore, a contemporary writing confronts cultural particularity of the past so that jurisprudence is now more acknowledged as the product of long history colored by a culture based on Hellenistic and Christian view of man and society (Chiba, 1986). While it may be the most advanced science of law ever accomplished by man, jurisprudence’s universality may no longer be taken for granted, and the conceptualizations of the great jurisprudence no longer accepted as trans-historical, timeless truths (Calhoun, 1995). Reflexivity in jurisprudence informs any research revisiting core propositions on the Rule-of-Law so as to critique their universality in the context of environment. While undertaking the process, it has been useful to remain conscious of the potential for parochialism in the ethnography from the environment point (Godemont, 1999). It is neither to be assumed that the environment is so unique that Western jurisprudence is inappropriate nor that core propositions like the necessity of separation of powers are un-impeachable with regard to the environment. On the other hand, Sotiropoulos (2015) concluded that by focusing on the theoretical contributions and public action of two major contentions:

First the legal, political and economic thought of the jurists was not only conversant with Continental liberal currents of the Restoration; but, due to the particular local context, made original contributions to liberalism. Indeed, Greek liberals shared a lot with their counterparts in France, Italy and Germany, not least the belief that liberty originated in law and the state and not against them.

Second the contention is that any ‘transformation-of-thought’, informed the ‘long-revolution’ of the 1860s and the new system of power this latter established. By that, it shows that liberal jurisprudence provided the intellectual foundations upon which the modern Greek state was build. Thus,

If (law, modern law and rule-of-law), then (no Juris in England);

If (Anglo-Persians fuel Nuclear reactor),

then (burials sites of Prophets be places for public conveniences).

if (theft), then (it shall be God, Gold and underground reserves)

If (work concluded), then (say observation of an order).

If (void signature, rule-of-Law & Time),

then (no slavery, no freedom & democracy)

On Observations, it may be good enough to trigger Juris from the Greek Pillars-of-Parthenon, including illusive factors of Time, theology and enviro-facts that may trigger an evolve understanding of Jurisprudence. The alterity may include competitive public system base innovations (this shall be the base of secondary knowledge, or AI, including the expected entry of the AI system of jurisprudence). The ultimate natural system shall be base the physical matter of knowledge, which requires evolve generations of long distance to go.

Think Jurisprudence

It is a bias claim where the Rule-of-Law has been used as one of the key dimensions that determine the quality and good governance of a country (Kaufman, 2007). Worldwide Governance Indicators defines the rule of law as: the extend to which agents have confidence and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, the police and the courts, and the likelihood of crime or violence.

Based on this definition the Worldwide Gov-indicators project has developed aggregate measurements for the rule of law in more than 200 countries. Rule of law may a fundamental doctrine by which every individual must obey and submit to the law, and not arbitrary action by other people of groups, and no one is above the law, which was assumed to be the order of the Englishman.

The English and Saudi Monarchs do not have written constitutions, this is to enable them to have the upper hand in manipulating facts of the events. Rule of law, along with Parliamentary Sovereignty & court rulings is fundamentally defining principle of England un-written constitution. The rule of law comprises a principles and values, such as: Legal certainty, Equality, Fairness, Retrospective legislation, due process. Neuberger (2013) commented that:

the laws must be freely accessible, with crown liability
the laws must satisfy certain requirements; including access to justice, if any, has a number of components of (crown liability):

(1) A competent and impartial judiciary;

(2) Accessible courts; with crown liability

(3) properly administered courts; crown liability

(4) a competent and honest legal profession;

(5) effective procedure for getting a case to court;

(6) effective legal process;

(7) effective execution; crown liability, and

(8) affordable means of justice, crown liability

However, court cases published online at: <eisrael.co.uk> of the dates 2015-2021 proved that this lord Neuberger aimed to provide legal existence for British crown of England and Saudi Arabia, non of which had a written constitution. Herein, the GB-Crown and its subsidiaries of states of common-wealth acted to develop the ideal model of no written constitution based on the anti-Semite crowed-control-law of events of illusive Time. The Jurisprudence is evolving on several planes (Ogwurike, 1979). It has since gone beyond the effects of law on society to include society’s effect on law (Schur, 1968). Thus, if (effects of Rule-of-Law on society), then (it shall be the society’s effect on Rule-of-Law during evolve events of void Rule-of-Time).

Continue cursor/ next columns