Intro-Legal: Yisrael Juris

Notary Public: This Pending PhD-in-Law Impacts Juris tools of close loop feedback control system of illusive-errors that never criticize anti-Semite self-destructed GB Crown

Darling Buds-of-Exodus: Welcome Hebrew auto-affiliation; Quote Ref: https://site.eu/?aff=fU9pcd; &; https://site.eu/?aff=juTNcC; @ Mt.Temple

The Global Pedagogy Journal Exodus 2021-26, 3rd-ed issn: 1740-9527 & issn: 1742-819x

Intro-Juris

©IQ-MOSSAD©: If (Israeli President & PM Bibi do not Handshake), then (it shall be snake-shake, Ass-shake, or milk-shake @ sensual-instances); adding that If (the approach to Law, Rule-of-Law, Rule-of-Time and practices of faith of Abraham are amateurish and pragmatic in character), then (true concept of jurisprudence, or Faith-of-Yisrael, has been shunned); and moreover an adverbial reflective image is enforced herein in between state-of-Israel vs England. The Oxford English Dictionary (OEA) is showing political stress-strain of deviation of evolve authenticity of enviro-function. Thus, the term England is used to replace the word Israel. The UK, Israel, and Saudi Arabia have unwritten-constitutions. While in Israel, it is designed in accordance with the Harari Decision 1950, which was adopted by the Israeli Knesset, and enacted several Basic Laws of Israel dealing with government arrangements and human rights, of partite. The Saudi order is based on Quran and Hadeath (Chinese-Whisper), of Mo [puh]. In GB the Crown is the factual order, and the lords and PM are executives base six-pillars of no written constitution. This introductory is also related to the terms of law and rule-of-law in England. It has an Englishness of the Angle-ish of early land settlers (Angles, Saxons, and Jutes), who occupied the land by force and irrigate it by bloody wars, with pandemics and hunger, named and repopulated it as England with the orders of the wish of rulers, and from which rule-of-rulers evolved in the land of England, or the evolved land of Genocide of Erebus. For example, the events of the past ten thousand Calendar years, nature forwarded the quality of genetic fingerprint invested in the descendants of Hebrew Jacob (Yisrael, the Gods Wrestler) of Isaac of Abraham of Noah. Nature ordered those unique Hebrew to forward almost all prophets, then to build numerous civilizations and to organize the order of the otherness. As gratitude of an anti-act of the otherness, the Hebrew became slaves who served variety of Gods worldwide; and such, it is argued, is the case in England, as a home from home. It is a fact that England needs the quality of proactive professional English citizens who minimize pressure on law and order and to assist progressive civilization. This may provide a window for the development of an English Jurisprudence in England, and not to copy paste the otherness or vice versa. The reality in England 2021 AD is presented by the erratic feedback of no responsive correction, in which English Crown presents three factors: 1: an overburden placed on the GB citizens; 2: the act of the otherness; 3: slaves driver aided economic generation; 4: GB crown interacts with nature in unjust order; and 5: deceptive-dividing system of terror.

Continue cursor/ next columns

The aim of re-populating the land is to legitimize free-hold land landlord, slaves & theft. The crown’s means of thinking kept in a Pandora box from Greek to Romans to EU crowns. The events of divide to rule England shall never unite the mishmash of any groups of citizens. Thus, the crown prince of 2021 AD may aim to gain the post of king emperor of the universe and beyond, after his prolonged experience as the ex-Head of fake IRA. It is a triangle of 3-men surrounding the center of HM, neutralized by Star-of-David. This emperor to be have no written constitution for Britain. This may be due to the feedback errors of being toying, as ex-HQ IRA, with the de-population of North Ireland that ended with differentiated demography. In England, and the rest of Europe, the nobilities were engaging their citizens in successive internal wars of genocide resulted in cycles of land population. This aims to conquer the land and enslave people, including the Hebrew immigrants. This also resulted in famine and hunger in England and Europe. Herein, the nobility succeeded at a later stage to brainwash and re-united citizens under religions' influences, to fight in crusade of invading nations beyond Middle- and Far-East, aiming trading genocide base theft of resources. These acts created scale of unjust. As a result, the successive British generations in England and elsewhere became passive, and easy to be the push-over, brainwashed, and to be manipulated via evolve crown’s instruments. But, the English Crown employed foreign professionals of the instance of the events of a safe feedback to maintain control. If (reliance on foreigners), then (trading slavery). This English act of reliance on slaves from overseas colonies generated resentment in England, due to the lack, or absence, of brain power. Other Crown factors that disabled English ID including the terror, divide-to-rule, isolation, type of grant allocation, secrecy of professional services, with no access to info and just services, blackmail and intimidation among the political parties of Chaos. If (reliance on slaves), then (Monarch acts God of Erebus of Chaos). The lack of evolve English ID, loyalty and secrecy issues affected the crown. Thus, the English crown ordered its extended royal family to step down and to engage in the control of civil servants duties, the air force, army and navy training and feedback. This drill became the first duty of the Royals. Today, this act is widespread among the EU royalties and nobilities, as well as the subsidiary kingdoms, such as the Hashemite of test-tube Royals. The GB Crown is able to lease Iraq (land and citizens) to the Spanish crown for 25 or 50 years, and the word of sovereign Iraq and the UN itself have no significant other than showing the wrong face of the coin. It seems abnormal that those monarchs of the EU exchange, leases, or sell foreign colonies to keep it in the family of royals, and their alterity failed Gods of Erebus.

Continue cursor/ next columns

Relevant herein is the practice and approach of England prestigious judiciary institutions, the ancient universities and leading public judiciary systems. Until recently, and even perhaps today, these have been dominant, both socially and in term of the formation of the climate of opinion. It is symptomatic that the public judiciary system, in general, have until recently rejected the professional training in any sense relevant to the job of a Judiciary, it is a close circuit bar. Although toying with the idea of 17th or 19th century judiciary systems has never adopted positive attitude to such training, which traditionally has been seen as perhaps relevant and important for jurisprudence and judiciary system, but certainly not to someone taking up the gentlemanly profession of jurisprudence in the judiciary system. This was seen not so much as a job anyone from the middle or upper middle class could do, but as something those wished to lead, having the appropriate social origins including a degree at Oxford or Cambridge, could learn, through experience on the job of the judiciary system. Certainly, no special training was necessary (Storr, 1889 and Worsley, 1967).

If (educational learning difficulty), then

(it shall be the unjust of Goddess Just of God Erebus)

If (Dicey argues), then (Why no Jurisprudence in England?)

If (legal doctrine), then (foundation of law admin in all states)

The English common law is described herein as: ‘The unwritten law of England, administered by the King's courts, which purports to be derived from the ancient usage, and is embodied in the older commentaries and the reports of abridged cases, as opposed, in that sense, to statute law, and as distinguished from the equity administered by the Chancery and similar courts, and from other systems such as ecclesiastical law, and admiralty law.’ For usage in the United States, the description is the body of legal doctrine is the foundation of the law administered in all states settled from England, and those formed by later settlement, as in the 19th century, which clarified that ‘The judiciary system and its elements were centrally concerned with the social order which could not effectively undertaken in the home and as related to a religious order.’ This argued why no Juris in England (Dicey, 1885)? The result has been that judiciary system and jurisprudence, as a subject of enquiry and study, still less as a science, has historically, has little to no prestige in England, having been to all intents and purposes ignored in the most prestigious judiciary institutions and system(s). On the other hand, the matter of jurisprudence for the middle class was taken seriously in France, Europe, Russia an elsewhere. Thus, jurisprudence seems to be the crown taste of just and order. In England, everything was neglected and a laissez-faire pragmatism predominated (Arnold, 1874). The situation has to some extent been perpetuated. The dominant judiciary systems in England have had no concern, or regards, with the theory or the understanding of jurisprudence, its relation to the practice with judiciary, and this may be due to the Genocide direction of the crown. If (England), then (Genocide is the scale of measure of theft). If (Yisrael is a pioneer of ultimate Hebrew advancements), then (the Hebrews went where no man has gone before). If (Yisrael is expecting), then (it is the Hebrews Noah Arc-II, of awaiting sailing). If (Rule-of-law in England), then (it shall be the Rule-of-Loo, and Rule-of-Poo). This is taught and to be taught for R&D in England & Wales since the Christian Crusade.

Continue cursor/ next columns

Moreover, the US itself remains a self-governing English colony, of England Commonwealth. However, Alfred the Great was Anglo-Saxon king, a reformer of the 9th century who reformed the law and assembled a law code (Doom Book), which was based on biblical commandment, and held that the same law had to be applied to all persons, whether rich, poor, friends or enemies, inspired by Leviticus 19:15 (Alter, 2004). In 1215, head of CoE Archbishop Stephen Langton gathered the Barons in England and forced King John and future sovereigns and magistrates back under the rule of law, preserving ancient liberties by Magna Carta (1215 AD) in return for exacting taxes. This foundation for a constitution was carried into the United States Constitution. In 1481, during the reign of Ferdinand II of Aragon, the Spanish Constitution was approved by the General Court of Catalonia, establishing the submission of Royal power (included its officers) to the laws of the Principality of Catalonia (Alter, 2004). Thus, Samuel Rutherford, of the 17th century, was a Scottish theologian who employed jurisprudence by arguing against the divine right of the king, and drawing principally on Aristotle's Politics, that among forms of government an Empire of Laws and not of Men was preferable to an Empire of Men and not of Laws (Harrington, 1747). One more act of the test-tube babies of the 1970s ended the left over of any Englishness identity, including the expression of ginger-head. Thus, the English citizens or their substitute became the acting robots of no-value, despite the opposite deceptive flagship of fake freedom and democracy which never existed in England itself. If (painted otherwise), then (the fact of grim picture of no hope, with or without the test-tube generations of kings posted to govern colonies). If (Windsor 1917 of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha), then (their order shall be deceased as in God Erebus of Chaos). If (ginger-head), then (test-tube male-royal). If (among forms of government an Empire of Laws and not of Men, not preferable to an Empire of Men and not of Laws), then (both fake orders are of Erebus and against evolve enviro-evolution). In the EU judiciary and practices traditions of the continent, the term Jurisprudence has an honored place, stemming perhaps particularly from the work and thinking of Greek and Roman-law, but developed and elaborated in the 19th century through the work of their own professionals and others. Outside England and its commonwealth, the concept of Jurisprudence as a Rule-of-Law has strong roots in this tradition, as well as its void pedagogy. If (educational learning difficulty), then (it shall be the unjust red line of Goddess Just of Genocide operators of God Erebus). It was established in England in 2002 AD, by Yisrael, and accused of anti-Semite. It shall be remain classified due to the discovery of the matter-of-Knowledge. Not so in England, it is now about four hundred years since Scotland forwarded its jurisprudence. Since then less and less heard of this claim. The striking aspect of the current thinking about jurisprudence is its electric character, reflecting deep confusion of thought, as related to Yisrael Jurisprudence. But, what is juris, when oxford dictionary is evolving? It is useful to advance an interpretation as to why? the concept of jurisprudence has been shunned in England, and why? instead the English approach to Rule-of-Law theory and practice has tended to be amateurish & pragmatic in character (Fletcher, 1889).

Continue cursor/ next columns

For while the judiciary system expressed, at least in its practice, a total disregard for jurisprudence, in fact a systematic, rational approach was being developed elsewhere as an indigenous growth within the judiciary system, and specifically in the past two centuries. This is a genocide phenomenon, which worth serious attention for its lessons. For example dated 2014 AD, a Professor of Law at the Loo University of Hull in England of East-Riding-Council of Yorkshire of the top 10 institutional global terrorists, who was seated in a luxury place, was approached about the means to solve the case fraud published on website address [eisrael.co.uk 2016-22]. Thinking a king seated at the cave of mount temple, the professor replied, why we need to change the system if it is working very well for us? Yisrael wished him well and departed the University of Hull due to its links with projects Genocide base fear, since 1982 (evidenced by eye witnesses). The best teaching course in the UK and commonwealth was introduced voluntarily by a cleaner, raped by a Kurdish student, known as Professor Loo, which addressed overseas Muslim students about means of Poo, using means of Loo. The context of what was serious attempt to integrate theoretical knowledge with the practice of judiciary is to found in the work of the advanced judiciary boards within the Hebrew system. Described as citadels of radicalism of the 19th century France, these with their higher judiciary system of various kinds were now incorporated technical boards developing cohesive judiciary, with an organic relation between the various stages, having perspectives of covering justice. In England 2020 AD, at last people had been brought into the courts, buildings were erected, and judiciary base education was developing as a profession. The extravagance of the high court had some basis in fact, and the outlook was optimistic. This was the context of the quiet sudden and apparently rapid development in jurisprudence and practice of positive jurisprudence means. But, was this a fake act? The updated English governing system comprises the lowest cell of civil servant of village Parishes of the local constituency including religious body aided political party of local councilors. Aiming central grants in the name of electorates, the parish have to use all means of terror (e.g. you are with us or against us), including means of self feed back control that aim to maintain crown control crowed. Single-cell civil-servants operators think accomplish this by using sophisticated terror via English norm of behavior, in the name of Gods of Erebus of Chaos. Thus, If (Rule of Law), then (means of Genocide base theft); If (reliance on science), then (illusion of bankruptcy); If (do what you told), then (see, say, sort @ noises of terror); and If (Juris), then (Rule of Law of enviro-function).

Yisrael Memo 2019-21

If (memory base order of judgment), then (volatile memory vanish with dementia or Alzheimer diseases). If (non-volatile memory or order base judgment), then (it shall be the physical matter of knowledge of coded command, and not the solid-state-physics of digital computing of storage-data of occurred past events, known as the secondary knowledge of past events that re-introduced as in history redefined itself as the AI or Artificial Intelligence). If (Fake MP Fatlawi of fake Hashemite-IQ entity are Genocide Operators of Gods of Erebus), then (Tzaddikim have no affiliation with the fake Fatlawi or any Anglo-Persian agents). If GB colonization, then Fake IQ-MP Fatlawi of IQ occupation shall be hunted down for 99 years.

Continue cursor/ next columns

Intro-Fact (Event-of-Act)

If (Jurisprudence), then (evolve theology & Gov Pillars). ISSN 1740-9527 & 1742-819X (2006) shall also be credited for recording the jurisprudence social-facts at Jerusalem Temple-Mount, which reads:

A variant creator creates nature of changing material entity of no-linear events of occurrence. Any material shall be characterized by learning ability of evolve reasoning base sensory feedback of hystereses-print. It also provides a limited mortality by energy and distance, or a destiny to die. In the bio-creations, a taboo of jurisprudence hysteresis exists as an output of sensory feedback of an evolve brain orders and the AGB. This system generates sensual feeling of Pillars Parthenon base anti-Semite & Newton’s Time.

A landlord or a land occupier creates the needed, after observing nature, Rule-of-Ruler to populate or harvest the land. A man of evolve reasoning may act under Rule-of-Time (Newton's absolute, eternal and illusive). The reasoning of evolve Yisrael logic (2020) may state:

If (a land populated by subordinate slaves), then (a Ruler becomes the Law that needs 6-pillars of Government of tax collection).
If (man creates a law), then (a law is an act, or means, of a mortal God, or a monarch of crown).
If (Empires rise-and-fall), then (nature has no-linear laws and its orders evolve with the ever changing creator's acts).

Some may also see the illusive expressions of the rule-of-Law or rule-of-Time seem to be ambiguous terms that may refer or mean different things in different context, such as ill linguistics:

1. According to the law: No individual can be ordered by the government to pay civil damages or suffer criminal punishment except in strict accordance with well-established procedures of order;

2. Under the law: No branch of government is above the Order, and no public official may act arbitrarily or unilaterally outside the Order;

3. According to a higher law: No written Order may be enforced by the government unless it conforms, or agree by, with certain unwritten universal principles of fairness, morality and justice that transcend human legal systems. Such ethics are beyond England.

The evolving material entity of post biblical era characterizes non-evolve (static) mortal Gods and Goddesses, which aim to preside over subjective broken pillars of fake Rule-of-Law, or regulations of:

(i) Standard-of-Proof (base illusive Time);

(ii) Balance probability; and illusive Rule-of-Time.

Thus, the theological aspect of the so-called holy books of God is based on what was edited by Hebrew successors of Noah:

Jurisprudence is theory or philosophy of law (system of rules regulating action of its members and enforce by penalties. Rules are procedure of activity of event after learning from observed nature of variant evolve enviro-function). Rule is an enforced conditional order.
Hebrew King Hammurabi, of the Babylonian Dynasty (1792-1750 BC), was assassinated after 5-years of ruling. This was accomplished by the opponents of Code-of-Hammurabi which consisted of 282-Laws (see pre-juris).
Their Orders have priority of application when so-called modern-law fail, with scaled consequences adjusting: flawed an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth (lex-talionis), and depending on its social status.

Continue cursor/ next columns

In the cases of an assault, fixed penalties were set for various injuries, although stallion was still permitted if one person broke another’s limb. The laws were directed with scaled punishments, adjusting an eye for an eye, depending on status. The Roman and Anglo-Saxon legal code of rule-of-law substituted payment of wergild for direct retribution. For example, a particular person's life had a fixed value, derived from the social status, and any homicide was compensated by paying wergilds. However, under the British Common Law, successful plaintiffs were entitled to repayment equal to their loss (in monetary terms). In the modern tort law system, this has been extended to translate non-economic losses into money as well. Herein, the HM Court & Tribunal Services (HM-CTS) is presented by the state on behalf of the sitting Gods, and operates probability base Court Procedural Rules (CPR). It requires (standard of proof) of bias fallacy of fraud dice base gambling. The malfunction mechanism(s), if any, of related judiciary system is presented in a few cases in: www.eisrael.co.uk; wherein white-collar professionals may benefit from loopholes, and knowingly and/or recklessly, the updated Justice costs more than the Monetary Compensation, if any, due to lack of transparency and deceptive criminal practices within the so-called corrupt operators of fraud rule-of-law. This together with multi directions of no-guidance base divide-to-rule may aim to null the judiciary system of governing society, for the benefit of theft. In Europe, Adam Smith (≈1776 AD) triggered the principles of modern void jurisprudence at Edinburgh and Glasgow universities; and the actual developments started in Europe before 2008 AD. The aim of this research is to revitalize the Hebrew advancements of the past 5000 years. There may be further questions (void & null) about the Rule-of-Law:

The voidness and uncertainty about the essence of Rule of Law;

Whether Rule-of-Law primarily resides in institutional configurations or in diffuse structures, or crown-grown crime:

Rule-of-Law promoters are short of knowledge about how the Rule-of-Law develops in societies and how? Such developments may be stimulated beyond simplistic efforts to copy institutional forms (Carothers 2003).
In so-called Rule-of-Law development, there is a widespread sensor that simply exporting institutions and laws does not strengthen the Rule-of-Law, thus we need to understand:

What makes law tick in the complex setting of today?

What goes on behind the institutions and formal structures?

Who presides above the law, if any?

Additionally, the expressions of illusive Rule-of-Law, the residual of the illusive void Time, is a contested concept. There is no universally acceptable definition (Li 1999, Fallon 1997 and Radin 1989). It would be naïve to seek a semantically univocal and ideologically neutral definition of the Rule-of-Law base illusion, to do so, given the many meanings which have been or may be ascribed to the concept, may result in the dismissal of the concept as imprecise, unascertainable, contaminated by evaluative judgments (Zolo 2007).

Continue cursor/ next columns

Thereafter prolonged Greek-Persian wars in Babylon, the Hebrew (12-tribes of slaves) re-edited text of their God-significance and Code-of-Hammurabi on slates and plates of clay & including the Hebrew heritage stored under-ground in Meso-Babylon 1750 BC.
A Hebrew scholar and editor (Rabbi Torah) of post Moses era formatted and edited the Old-Testaments (published Books 1-5, Book-6 was forbidden, as classified, and Book-7 referred to unknown or impossible to achieve). These core text formulated the one-God faith from which Judaism evolved; and subsequent events enabled Christianity to format, so-called, the New-Testament. Thereafter, the Prophet (Mo puh) of Islam was Hebrew-illiterate, did his hand-written plates of, so-called, Islam-prophesy. The original Plates of clay were guarded at his daughter's home. Thus, Prophet Mo (puh) and his pregnant daughter were murdered. The original plates of text were stolen from Saudi-Medina to its present Hebrew home of editorial and publishing media @ Chifill of MesoHebrew Babylon.
On the 7th century AD, Rabbi Koran descendent of Rabbi Torah, successive scholar-editor-publisher acted the editor of the original plates of Islamic text (moved after the death of prophet Mo [puh] from Mecca to Chifill-Babylon). Then, Quran-book of Islam was in manual hand print. Six copies, reference to star-of-David were distributed, and it is believed that one copy remain, in place, for the Testament of specific order.
printed in 6-copies, and distributed worldwide.
If (Hebrew Mo of Islam was illiterate in Hebrew), then (Mo was communicating the physical matter of knowledge). Some of the slates were discovered in 2008 at Chifil-Babylon (Noah home of theo-editorial and publishing media) marked by the remains of a demolished Mosque. The book of Islamic Quran also claimed that the on-going static-God may be described by, e.g. the greatest, generous, holly, of 99 descriptions, which is indicated on the Palms and 99 = 81 Left + 18 Right hand-palms. It is the justified genetic reasoning in England 2000AD, thus:
If (Chinese Whisper), then (no Jurisprudence).
If (no written constitution), then (Islamic Sharia is a Chinese-Whisper and not a jurisprudence)
If (Torah and Koran are editors), then (Books of Torah and Book of Quran were editions of Chinese whispers of events)
If (old and new Testaments are of Chinese whisper), then (Chinese have technical advancement of communication & means of delivery).

The Lex-Talionis (action versus reaction of feedback sensory system) of 1750 BC has lost neither its moral significance nor its penal relevance. This is reflected in the modern retribution and utilitarian theories of punishments and in contemporary law through the recognition of proportionality as the fundamental principle of sentencing under the criminal code. Thereafter, the Roman’s copy-paste the illusive Greek rule-of-law, failed Lex-Talionis, and moved toward monetary compensation as a substitute for the assumed vengeance of (an eye for an eye, i4i). The tension between principles versus mandatory sentences of imprisonment was also examined in Canada.

Continue cursor/ next columns

Parmenides (500 BC) also argued Rule-Law-Time as thought of an illusive of evolve reasoning. If (the OED defines Publish as a law communicate a libel to a third party [law: a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation or a written defamation]), then (the OED Oxford English Dictionary is an erratic institutional Order of Genocide in the presence of fake justice and pillars of governess). Thus, is the OED and other evolving sources of info are trust worthy? If (disinfo), then (self-liquidation Windsor of Erebus of Chaos). A legal and political theory would be subject, on the same grounds of imprecision, to expunge from communication. Herein. what matters is not semantic definiteness, but communicative clarity of the concept. By endorsing such a weak epistemology, social theory may then elaborate coherent interpretations rather than explicative definitions of the concerned concepts (Zolo, 2007). The Rule-of-Law is not a single principle or maxim (Fogelklou 1997), but a concept which comprises several principles and rules governing the mechanisms of the legal order and giving the content a certain quality. Thus, rule-of-law may or may not work in the public interests; while legal-Nature does not recognize any public interest, and public interests may recognize natures' interests (one directional Order). In tackling the questions it will first and foremost require the multi- and inter-disciplinary approaches, encompassing Order and behavioral sciences of evolve reasoning. To that we must devote ourselves with great urgency (Muller 2008).

Crown Modeling, Facts of

The Crown factual model, by its act of organization, indicates that Rule-of-Order is not yet being understood. The Crown holders (e.g. the Windsor) are degrading their value, recklessly, despite their unlimited advisors. This is due to the following fact that the English Crown holds (by act of genocide) more than 99% of the total earth resources, and that the crown purse and location or value is completely different from that of the subjects or slaves, indicated by the illusive Time limit fiat currency. Thus, the crown holder have the HM status as well as the God of gender status who produce unlimited lords to cover resources of theft, regardless of theo-economics. This system may trigger differentiation with the ancient Greek theology, such as:

The term [he] refers to [Gender] of God Erebus; linguistic flash.
The proxy executives are the Hebrew of Jacob (< 01%).
The otherness have little to no effect in long term of events;
If (Rule-of-Crown are higher than Rule-of-subjects), then (Rule-of-Law of two tear are due to the absence of universal standards of measures, from the observers point of evolve enviro-function).
If (Two tears Rule-of-Law), then (bias different economics).

On Observations, If (Abraham Faith), then (it shall be Faith-of-Yisrael, or Juris of no Time of Just Faith of Yisrael Doctrine); if (approaches to Law, Rule-of-Law, Rule-of-Time and practices of faith of Abraham are amateurish and pragmatic in character), then (it shall be the faith-of-Yisrael, Moshiach King of Noah Arc-II); if (God in-waiting is based on two tear Order), then (the status quo of the forthcoming events mark the birth of new civilization). Thus, the Hashemite of Windsor of Gods of Erebus shall not fit any enviro-function of the Mesopotamia; and If (evil of Windsor), then (neutralized by Star-of-David).